Reading Like a Computer

Assignment Rubrics

This page provides rubrics for assessing written responses and major assignments in this course. Rubrics are organized by learning outcome and offer clear criteria for high-quality work.


Written Response Rubric

Criterion Exemplary (10) Proficient (8) Developing (6) Beginning (4) Incomplete (0)
Central Idea/Argument Clear, focused argument that directly engages course concepts; original thinking evident Clear argument that engages course concepts with mostly original thinking Argument present but somewhat unclear; relies heavily on course materials Argument vague or superficial; minimal engagement with concepts No clear argument or engagement
Evidence & Analysis Strong, specific evidence; sophisticated analysis showing critical thinking Good evidence; clear analysis connecting to argument Adequate evidence; basic analysis present Limited or generic evidence; minimal analysis Missing evidence or analysis
Visual Integration Visuals are essential to argument; multiple, well-chosen, clearly captioned; professional quality Visuals support argument; well-chosen, clearly captioned Some visuals present; captions present but could be clearer Visuals present but minimally integrated; weak captions Few/no visuals or poorly integrated
Writing Quality Exceptional clarity and style; sophisticated vocabulary; error-free Clear, well-organized; good word choice; minimal errors Generally clear; some organizational issues; minor errors Unclear in places; organizational problems; multiple errors Poor clarity and organization; numerous errors
Engagement with Course Material Synthesizes multiple class concepts; shows deep learning References several course materials; demonstrates understanding References course material; shows basic understanding Limited reference to course material No reference to course content

Assignment 1 & 2 Rubric

These assignments require you to apply computational text analysis methods to a corpus of your choice.

Criterion Exemplary (15) Proficient (12) Developing (9) Beginning (6) Incomplete (0)
Method Selection & Application Method(s) thoughtfully chosen and expertly applied; clear rationale; sophisticated use of tools Method(s) appropriate and correctly applied; clear purpose; good use of tools Method(s) appropriate but application could be stronger; adequate tool use Method(s) chosen but misapplied; limited tool mastery; unclear purpose Methods missing or fundamentally misapplied
Research Question & Design Compelling question; rigorous research design; demonstrates computational thinking Good question; sound research design; shows computational thinking Adequate question; basic research design; some computational thinking Vague question; weak design; limited computational thinking Missing or incoherent research design
Analysis & Results Results clearly presented and thoroughly analyzed; multiple perspectives considered Results clearly presented; solid analysis; most aspects addressed Results presented; basic analysis; some gaps Results presented but weakly analyzed Missing or unclear results
Critical Evaluation Sophisticated discussion of findings, limitations, biases, implications Good discussion of findings and limitations; considers some implications Adequate discussion; acknowledges some limitations Limited discussion; few limitations acknowledged No critical evaluation
Visual Communication Multiple, sophisticated visualizations; all clearly explained; essential to argument Clear, well-designed visualizations; appropriately explained Visualizations present; mostly clear; explanation adequate Visualizations present but unclear or poorly explained Few/no visualizations or incomprehensible
Writing Quality & Organization Exceptional clarity, flow, and organization; sophisticated voice; minimal errors Clear organization and flow; appropriate scholarly voice; minor errors Generally organized; mostly clear; some awkward passages; minor errors Organization could be clearer; writing needs improvement; several errors Disorganized; unclear writing; numerous errors

Final Project Rubric

The final project is evaluated on the quality of analysis, communication, and creative application of course concepts.

Criterion Exemplary (30) Proficient (24) Developing (18) Beginning (12) Incomplete (0)
Research Question & Corpus Compelling, well-defined question; appropriate and well-described corpus; clear significance Good question; appropriate corpus; clear purpose Adequate question; corpus appropriate though description could be stronger Vague question; corpus adequate but could be better justified Missing or unclear question/corpus
Method & Analysis Sophisticated, multi-method analysis; demonstrates mastery of course concepts; insightful findings Sound analysis using appropriate methods; good application of concepts; meaningful findings Adequate analysis with acceptable methods; shows understanding of concepts Basic analysis; limited methodological sophistication; marginal findings Weak or missing analysis
Critical Thinking & Limitations Nuanced discussion of findings, assumptions, limitations, and implications; acknowledges uncertainty Discusses findings, limitations, and implications; mostly thorough Acknowledges some limitations and implications; could be more thorough Limited discussion of limitations; implications unclear No critical evaluation
Visualization & Presentation Exceptional digital components; visuals are sophisticated, informative, and elegant; presentation is engaging Good visualizations and digital components; clear presentation; well-organized Adequate visualizations; presentation is clear but could be more engaging Basic visualizations; presentation adequate but could be improved Poor or missing visualizations/presentation
Writing Quality Excellent clarity, organization, and scholarly voice; sophisticated argument; minimal errors Clear writing; good organization; appropriate voice; minor errors Generally clear; acceptable organization; some awkward passages Clarity issues; organization could improve; several errors Poor writing quality; unclear organization; numerous errors
Originality & Creativity Highly original approach; creative application of methods; demonstrates independent thinking Original perspective; creative elements present; shows independent thinking Some originality; mostly follows standard approaches; adequate creativity Limited originality; mostly follows standard approaches Derivative; shows little independent thinking

Class Participation Rubric

Participation is assessed on the basis of:

Level Description
Excellent (10) Regularly contributes meaningful comments; asks thoughtful questions; participates actively in group work; attends consistently
Good (8) Contributes regularly; asks questions; participates in group work; good attendance
Satisfactory (6) Contributes occasionally; participates in group work; adequate attendance
Minimal (4) Rarely contributes; minimal participation; attendance issues
Absent (0) Does not participate or attend; or participates in disruptive manner

Oral Exam Rubric

Criterion Exemplary (15) Proficient (12) Developing (9) Beginning (6) Incomplete (0)
Content Mastery Demonstrates comprehensive and nuanced understanding of all key topics; integrates course concepts seamlessly Shows clear understanding of key topics; may miss minor nuance Adequate grasp of primary concepts; gaps in depth/accuracy Limited understanding; significant content gaps and misconceptions Shows minimal or incorrect understanding; fails to correctly address content
Accuracy of Responses Answers are consistently accurate, insightful, and logically justified; integrates evidence or examples where appropriate Mostly accurate responses with occasional minor errors; sound reasoning Some correct responses; inconsistent reasoning; moderate inaccuracies Frequent inaccuracies; reasoning is unclear or flawed Responses are largely incorrect or irrelevant
Organization & Structure Responses are well-structured and logical; easy to follow progression of ideas Clear structure with minor lapses in organization Organization is present but uneven; transitions may be weak Poorly organized responses; ideas are difficult to follow No discernible organization; answers are unfocused
Engagement with Questions Responds promptly and thoughtfully to questions; extends beyond the question to offer deeper insight Responds appropriately; shows solid understanding of question intent Responses address the question but lack depth or completeness Struggles to respond to questions; answers are incomplete or partially off-topic Unable to respond to questions meaningfully
Critical Thinking & Synthesis Demonstrates strong critical thinking; synthesizes ideas, connects concepts, and offers original perspective Shows some critical thinking; connections across concepts are present but not rich Basic reasoning present; limited synthesis of concepts Minimal critical thinking; responses are repetitive or descriptive only No evidence of critical thinking; superficial or absent reasoning

Feedback and Revision

  • Rubrics are provided with each assignment
  • Your work will be assessed according to these rubrics
  • Opportunities for revision may be available for some assignments—check assignment guidelines